Skip to main content

Classes of Fire

Depending on the country you are in, there are slightly different categorizations of fire, .e.g. its slightly different for USA from UK & Europe. Here will examine the USA's OSHA classifications.


In OSHA, fires can be divided into five classes:
  • Class A: These are fires involving flammable solids, e.g. wood, cloth, rubber, paper, and some types of plastics. An example of this type of fire would be a campsite fire.
  • Class B: These are fires involving flammable liquids or liquefiable solids, e.g. petrol, oil, paint and also some waxes & plastics, but not cooking fats or oils.
  • Class C: Class C fire involves energized electrical equipment. Such as motors, transformers and appliances. Remove the power and the class C fire becomes one of the other classes of fire. 
  • Class D: These are fires involving combustible metals, e.g. sodium, magnesium, and potassium.

  • Class K: These are fires involving cooking fats and oils such as animals fats and vegetable fats. The high temperature of these types of fats and oil when on fire far exceeds that of other flammable liquids which means that normal fire extinguishers should not be used.

Note:

 The only difference in U.K (HSE) classification of fire is that "Class C" is meant for Flammable Gases only and Fires of Electrical origin are mentioned under separate "Class E" which in case of USA (OSHA) is "Class C" (as seen above). 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Electrosmog & Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome (EHS)

Electrosmog is the invisible electromagnetic radiation resulting from the use of both wireless technology and mains electricity. The most common sources of wireless electrosmog are: Cordless phones Cordless baby alarms Mobile/cellular phone masts/towers/transmitters Mobile/cellular phones Wireless networks Electrosmog is responsible for a condition known as Electrosensitivity (ES) or Electro hyper sensitivity (EHS). Many people are getting Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome (EHS). It is a condition in which people are highly sensitive to electromagnetic fields  in the environment: power lines, motors, computers,  or in n an area such as a wireless hotspot or near celluar Towers, they experience pain or other symptoms. Such symptoms include: Headaches Disruptive sleep patterns Chronic fatigue Depression Hypersensitivity and erratic blood pressure Skin complaints Behavioural patterns in children Children, the elderly and anyone with a lowered...
Post a Comment
Read more

Noise Control By Engineering Methods

The OSHA Noise Standard (29CFR1910.95) states when the 8-hour noise exposure exceeds 90 dB-A, an effort to control noise through engineering methods must be attempted. Hearing protection alone is not an acceptable means of OSHA compliance to the noise standard. The reason is simple, the poorest means of protection, whether to noise or other health hazard, is to utilize personal protection (in this case, hearing plugs or muff). The best protection is to eliminate the excessive noise or isolate the individual from the noise source. That means some form of engineering control—design changes to the source or separation of a worker from the machine. There are a vast assortment of possibilities depending upon the noise source and the amount of energy (in the form of noise) that is produced. Remember that noise is energy and multiple sources compound the energy produced. For example: two (2) machines side-by-side each producing noise of 88 decibels each when combined that is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Safety Culture and Safety Performance

Let us discuss what makes some companies prone to accidents, while others are accident-free. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine the factors that make a company prone to accidents. There is a growing body of empirical evidence concerning the impact of safety culture on safety performance. Numerous studies have investigated characteristics of companies with low accident rates, while generally comparing  them with similar companies with higher-than-average accident rates. A fairly consistent result of these studies conducted in industrialised as well as in developing countries, emphasises the importance of senior managers' safety commitment and leadership for safety performance (Chew 1988; Hunt and Habeck 1993; Shannon et al. 1992; Smith et al. 1978).  Moreover, most studies show that in companies with lower accident rates, the personal involvement of top managers in occupational safety is at least as important as their decisions in the structuring of the safe...
Post a Comment
Read more